Monday, December 26, 2011

Morality (Dharma) in the Gita

Those who are following the news about the upcoming trial and proposed banning of the Bhagavad Gita in Russia will certainly be aghast that a nation would place on trial a book that forms the foundation of a religion. There have been protests against the trial, and appeals to the courts to drop the case. Even non-Hindus have spoken out against placing a scripture on trial. According to some Russian officials, the ban is not on the Gita per se, but only a commentary on the holy book. The good news is that sales of the Gita have gone up during this controversy, and a Krishna temple is expected to be built in Russia!

There may still be a small puzzling question as to why a holy book would be set in the middle of a war zone. The Gita is a dialog between Arjuna (Human) and Krishna (Divine) between two armies – a large force fighting for Duryodhana and a smaller one under Arjuna’s command. Before the war commences, Arjuna has some doubts that need to be resolved, beginning with – is it not moral to reject war rather than to engage in it? The moral dilemma is further complicated by the fact that Arjuna is fighting his cousin Duryodhana!

Almost anyone will accept and appreciate that one ought to wage peace and not war. But the conclusion at the end of the Gita appears to be different – Arjuna must fight the war, not flee! This conclusion requires justification, and this post will attempt to do so.

The Gita is a small part of the Epic Mahabharata. To give an idea of just how small a part – the Gita consists of 700 verses, while the Mahabharata consists of about 100,000 verses! No serious scholar in the history of interpreting the Gita has ever made the mistake of reading the Gita as disparate from the Epic Mahabharata. Unless the events of the epic are examined, there is no way to make sense of the moral dilemma of Arjuna. What were the series of events that gave rise to Arjuna’s dilemma, and make him want to abandon the war with Duryodhana? Here are the highlights indicating how vicious Duryodhana really is:

1)  Duryodhana poisons Arjuna’s brother (Bhima), binds with a rope, and throws him into a river to drown. (Bhima is fortunately saved).

2)  Duryodhana invites Arjuna and his brothers to live in a palace, and one night while the guests are fast asleep, sets fire to the palace in order to burn them alive. (Arjuna and his brothers manage to escape).

3)  Duryodhana plays a game of chance (dice) with Arjuna’s brother, and wins over the opponent’s kingdom on the condition that it will be returned after thirteen years. At the end of thirteen years, Duryodhana refuses to return the kingdom, thus making war inevitable.

The main reason for the war is that Duryodhana does not fulfill the conditions of the bet – ruling over the kingdom for thirteen years and then returning it at the end of the period. What is outrageous is not only does Duryodhana not fulfill his part of the agreement, but also the manner in which he seeks war and not peace: 

Arjuna and his brothers: Duryodhana, you are bound by the conditions of the wager to return our kingdom to us, but can you at least spare us five villages that we can rule over?
Duryodhana: I don’t want to spare even five villages for you.
Arjuna and his brothers: How about five houses so we live as ordinary citizens in your kingdom?
Duryodhana: I will not give you as much land as there is on the tip of a needle!

This last statement is one of the most notorious uttered by Duryodhana – he wants no part of any peace process, and wishes only war!

To recap:
(1)    Arjuna is fighting evil.
(2)    Arjuna is a warrior, who cannot abandon his duty in the midst of a war zone! The peace process is past, war is the present reality!

Arjuna’s moral option is to go ahead with battle against evil and not abandon his responsibility towards his fellow warriors.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

A Spiritual Classic

Paul Brunton's A Search in Secret India is one of the great classics of modern spiritual literature. Extracts below from the most important chapters of the book, where he meets Ramana Maharshi.

The book has also been condensed into the smaller booklet The Maharshi and His Message.


“Arunachala! The sacred red mountain!” exclaims my companion, noticing the direction of my gaze. A fervent expression of adoration passes across his face. He is momentarily rapt in ecstasy like some medieval saint.

I ask him, “Does the name mean anything?”

“I have just given you the meaning,” he replies with a smile. “The name is composed of two words ‘Aruna’ and ‘Achala’, which means red mountain and since it is also the name of the presiding deity of the temple, its full translation should be ‘sacred red mountain’.”

“Then where does the holy beacon come in?”

“Ah! Once a year the temple priests celebrate their central festival. Immediately that occurs within the temple, a huge fire blazes out on top of the mountain, its flame being fed with vast quantities of melted butter (ghee) and camphor. It burns for many days and can be seen for many miles around. Whoever sees it, at once prostrates himself before it. It symbolises the fact that this mountain is sacred ground, overshadowed by a great deity.”

The hill now towers over our heads. It is not without its rugged grandeur, this lonely peak patterned with red, brown and grey boulders, thrusting its flat head thousands of feet into the pearly sky. Whether the holy man’s words have affected me or whether for some unaccountable cause, I find a queer feeling of awe arising in me as I meditate upon the picture of the sacred mountain, as I gaze up wonderingly at the steep incline of Arunachala.

“Do you know,” whispers my companion, “that this mountain is not only esteemed holy ground, but the local traditions dare to assert that the gods placed it there to mark the spiritual centre of the world!”

This little bit of legend forces me to smile. How naive it is!


The midday meal is over. The sun unmercifully raises the afternoon temperature to a degree I have never before experienced. But then, we are now in a latitude not so far from the Equator. For once I am grateful that India is favoured with a climate which does not foster activity, because most of the people have disappeared into the shady groves to take a siesta. I can, therefore, approach the Maharshi in the way I prefer, without undue notice or fuss.

I enter the large hall and sit down near him. He half reclines upon some white cushions placed on the divan. An attendant pulls steadily at the cord which operates the punkah fan. The soft burr of the rope and the gentle swish of the fan as it moves through the sultry air sound pleasantly in my ears.

The Maharshi holds a folded manuscript book in his hands; he is writing something with extreme slowness. A few minutes after my entry he puts the book aside and calls a disciple. A few words pass between them in Tamil and the man tells me that his Master wishes to reiterate his regrets at my inability to partake of their food. He explains that they live a simple life and never having catered for Europeans before do not know what the latter eat. I thank the Maharshi, and say that I shall be glad to share their unspiced dishes with them; for the rest, I shall procure some food from the township. I add that I regard the question of diet as being far less important than the quest which has brought me to his hermitage.

The Sage listens intently, his face calm, imperturbable and non-committal.

“It is a good object,” he comments at length.

This encourages me to enlarge upon the same theme.

“Master, I have studied our Western philosophies and sciences, lived and worked among the people of our crowded cities, tasted their pleasures and allowed myself to be caught up into their ambitions. Yet I have also gone into solitary places and wandered there amid the loneliness of deep thought. I have questioned the sages of the West; now I have turned my face towards the East. I seek more light.”

The Maharshi nods his head, as if to say, “Yes, I quite understand.”

“I have heard many opinions, listened to many theories. Intellectual proofs of one belief or another lie piled up all around me. I am tired of them, sceptical of anything which cannot be proved by personal experience. Forgive me for saying so, but I am not religious. Is there anything beyond man’s material existence? If so, how can I realize it for myself?”

The three or four devotees who are gathered around us stare in surprise. Have I offended the subtle etiquette of the hermitage by speaking so brusquely and boldly to their Master? I do not know; perhaps I do not care. The accumulated weight of many years’ desire has unexpectedly escaped my control and passed beyond my lips. If the Maharshi is the right kind of man, surely he will understand and brush aside mere lapses from convention.

He makes no verbal reply but appears to have dropped into some train of thought. Because there is nothing else to do and because my tongue has now been loosened, I address him for the third time:

“The wise men of the West, our scientists, are greatly honoured for their cleverness. Yet they have confessed that they can throw but little light upon the hidden truth behind life. It is said that there are some in your land who can give what our Western sages fail to reveal. Is this so? Can you assist me to experience enlightenment? Or is the search itself a mere delusion?”

I have now reached my conversational objective and decide to await the Maharshi’s response. He continues to stare thoughtfully at me. Perhaps he is pondering over my questions. Ten minutes pass in silence.

At last his lips open and he says gently:

“You say I. ‘I want to know.’ Tell me, who is that I?”

What does he mean? He has now cut across the services of the interpreter and speaks direct to me in English. Bewilderment creeps across my brain.

“I am afraid I do not understand your question,” I reply blankly.

“Is it not clear? Think again!”

I puzzle over his words once more. An idea suddenly flashes into my head. I point a finger towards myself and mention my name.

“And do you know him?”

“All my life!” I smile back at him.

“But that is only your body! Again I ask, ‘Who are you’?”

I cannot find a ready answer to this extraordinary query. The Maharshi continues:

“Know first that I and then you shall know the truth.”

My mind hazes again. I am deeply puzzled. This bewilderment finds verbal expression. But the Maharshi has evidently reached the limit of his English, for he turns to the interpreter and the answer is slowly translated to me:

“There is only one thing to be done. Look into your own self. Do this in the right way and you shall find the answer to all your problems.”

It is a strange rejoinder. But I ask him:

“What must one do? What method can I pursue?”

“Through deep reflection on the nature of one’s self and through constant meditation, the light can be found.”

“I have frequently given myself up to meditation upon the truth, but I see no signs of progress.”

“How do you know that no progress has been made? It is not easy to perceive one’s progress in the spiritual realm.”

“Is help of a Master necessary?”

“It might be.”

“Can a Master help a man to look into his own self in the way you suggest?”

“He can give the man all that he needs for this quest. Such a thing can be perceived through personal experience.”

“How long will it take to get some enlightenment with a Master’s help?”

“It all depends on the maturity of the seeker’s mind. The gunpowder catches fire in an instant, while much time is needed to set fire to the coal.”

I receive a queer feeling that the Sage dislikes to discuss the subject of Masters and their methods. Yet my mental pertinacity is strong enough to override this feeling, and I address a further question on the matter to him. He turns a stolid face toward the window, gazes out at the expanse of hilly landscape beyond, and vouchsafes no answer. I take the hint and drop the subject.

“Will the Maharshi express an opinion about the future of the world, for we are living in critical times?”

“Why should you trouble yourself about the future?” demands the Sage. “You do not even properly know about the present! Take care of the present; the future will then take care of itself.”

Another rebuff! But I do not yield so easily on this occasion, for I come from a world where the tragedies of life press far more heavily on people than they do in this peaceful jungle retreat.

“Will the world soon enter a new era of friendliness and mutual help, or will it go down into chaos and war?” I persist.

The Maharshi does not seem at all pleased, but nevertheless he makes a reply.

“There is One who governs the world, and it is His lookout to look after the world. He who has given life to the world knows how to look after it also. He bears the burden of this world, not you.”

“Yet if one looks around with unprejudiced eyes, it is difficult to see where this benevolent regard comes in,” I object.

The Sage appears to be still less pleased. Yet his answer comes:

“As you are, so is the world. Without understanding yourself, what is the use of trying to understand the world? This is a question that seekers after truth need not consider. People waste their energies over all such questions. First, find out the truth behind yourself; then you will be in a better position to understand the truth behind the world, of which yourself is a part.”

There is an abrupt pause. An attendant approaches and lights another incense stick. The Maharshi watches the blue smoke curl its way upwards and then picks up his manuscript book. He unfolds its pages and begins to work on it again, thus dismissing me from the field of his attention.

This renewed indifference of his plays like cold water upon my self-esteem. I sit around for another quarter of an hour, but I can see that he is in no mood to answer my questions. Feeling that our conversation is really at an end, I rise from the tiled floor, place my hands together in farewell, and leave him.


I resolve to make a fresh attempt to force my questions into voice and to engage the Maharshi in answer to them. I go out to one of his old disciples, who is doing some work in the adjoining cottage and who has been exceedingly kind to me, and tell him earnestly of my wish to have a final chat with his Master. I confess that I feel too shy to tackle the Sage myself. The disciple smiles compassionately. He leaves me and soon returns with the news that his Master will be very pleased to grant the interview.

I hasten back to the hall and sit down conveniently near the divan. The Maharshi turns his face immediately, his mouth relaxing into a pleasant greeting. Straightaway, I feel at ease and begin to question him.

“The yogis say that one must renounce this world and go off into secluded jungles or mountains, if one wishes to find truth. Such things can hardly be done in the West; our lives are so different. Do you agree with the yogis?”

The Maharshi turns to a brahmin disciple of courtly countenance. The latter translates his answer to me:

“The life of action need not be renounced. If you will meditate for an hour or two every day, you can then carry on with your duties. If you meditate in the right manner, then the current of mind induced will continue to flow even in the midst of your work. It is as though there were two ways of expressing the same idea; the same line which you take in meditation will be expressed in your activities.”

“What will be the result of doing that?”

“As you go on you will find that your attitude towards people, events and objects will gradually change. Your actions will tend to follow your meditations of their own accord.”

“Then you do not agree with the yogis?” I try to pin him down. But the Maharshi eludes a direct answer.

“A man should surrender the personal selfishness which binds him to this world. Giving up the false self is the true renunciation.”

“How is it possible to become selfless while leading a life of worldly activity?”

“There is no conflict between work and wisdom.”

“Do you mean that one can continue all the old activities in one’s profession, for instance, and at the same time get enlightenment?”

“Why not? But in that case one will not think that it is the old personality which is doing the work, because one’s consciousness will gradually become transferred until it is centred in That which is beyond the little self.”

“If a person is engaged in work, there will be little time left for him to meditate.”

The Maharshi seems quite unperturbed at my poser.

“Setting apart time for meditation is only for the merest spiritual novices,” he replies. “A man who is advancing will begin to enjoy the deeper beatitude, whether he is at work or not. While his hands are in society, he keeps his head cool in solitude.”

“Then you do not teach the way of yoga?”

“The yogi tries to drive his mind to the goal, as a cowherd drives a bull with a stick, but on this path the seeker coaxes the bull by holding out a handful of grass.”

“How is that done?”

“You have to ask yourself the question, ‘Who am I?’. This investigation will lead in the end to the discovery of something within you which is behind the mind. Solve that great problem, and you will solve all other problems thereby.”

There is a pause as I try to digest his answer. From the square-framed and barred hole in the wall which does duty as a window, as it does in so many Indian buildings, I obtain a fine view of the lower slopes of the sacred hill. Its strange outline is bathed in the early morning sunlight.

The Maharshi addresses me again:

“Will it be clear if it is put in this way? All human beings are ever wanting happiness, untainted with sorrow. They want to grasp a happiness which will not come to an end. The instinct is a true one. But have you ever been struck by the fact that they love their own selves most?”

“Well?”

“Now relate that to the fact that they are ever desirous of attaining happiness through one means or another, through drink or through religion, and you are provided with a clue to the real nature of man.”

“I fail to see ---”

The tone of his voice becomes higher.

“Man’s real nature is happiness. Happiness is inborn in the true Self. His search for happiness is an unconscious search for his true Self. The true Self is imperishable; therefore when a man finds it, he finds a happiness which does not come to an end.”

“But the world is so unhappy?”

“Yes, but that is because the world is ignorant of its true Self. All men, without exception, are consciously or unconsciously seeking for it.”

“Even the wicked, the brutal and the criminal?” I ask.

“Even they sin because they are trying to find the Self’s happiness in every sin which they commit. This striving is instinctive in man, but they do not know that they are really seeking their true selves, and so they try these wicked ways first as a means to happiness. Of course, they are wrong ways, for a man’s acts are reflected back to him.”

“So we shall feel lasting happiness when we know this true Self?”

The other nods his head.

A slanting ray of sunshine falls through the unglazed window upon the Maharshi’s face. There is serenity in that unruffled brow, there is contentment around that firm mouth, there is a shine-like peace in those lustrous eyes. His unlined countenance does not belie his revelatory words.

What does the Maharshi mean by these apparently simple sentences? The interpreter has conveyed their outward meaning to me in English, yes, but there is a deeper purport which he cannot convey. I know that I must discover that for myself. The Sage seems to speak, not as a philosopher, not as a pundit trying to explain his own doctrine, but rather out of the depth of his own heart. Are these words the marks of his own fortunate experience?

“What exactly is this Self of which you speak? If what you say is true, then there must be another self in man.”

His lips curve in smile for a moment.

“Can a man be possessed of two identities, two selves?” he makes answer. “To understand this matter it is first necessary for a man to analyse himself. Because it has long been his habit to think as others think, he has never faced his ‘I’ in the true manner. He has not a correct picture of himself; he has too long identified himself with the body and the brain. Therefore, I tell you to pursue this enquiry, ‘Who am I?’”

He pauses to let these words soak into me. I listen eagerly to his next sentences.

“You ask me to describe this true Self to you. What can be said? It is That out of which the sense of the personal ‘I’ arises, and into which it shall have to disappear.”

“Disappear?” I echo back. “How can one lose the feeling of one’s personality?”

“The first and foremost of all thoughts, the primeval thought in the mind of every man, is the thought ‘I’. It is only after the birth of this thought that any other thoughts can arise at all. It is only after the first personal pronoun ‘I’ has arisen in the mind that the personal pronoun ‘you’ can make its appearance. If you could mentally follow the ‘I’ thread until it leads you back to its source, you would discover that, just as it is the first thought to appear, so is it the last to disappear. This is a matter which can be experienced.”

“You mean that it is perfectly possible to conduct such a mental investigation into oneself?”

“Assuredly! It is possible to go inwards until the last thought ‘I’ gradually vanishes.”

“What is left?” I query. “Will a man then become quite unconscious, or will he become an idiot?”

“Not so! On the contrary, he will attain that consciousness which is immortal, and he will become truly wise, when he has awakened to his true Self, which is the real nature of man.”

“But surely the sense of ‘I’ must also pertain to that?” I persist.

“The sense of ‘I’ pertains to the person, the body and the brain,” replies the Maharshi calmly. “When a man knows his true Self for the first time, something else arises from the depths of his being and takes possession of him. That something is behind the mind; it is infinite, divine, eternal. Some people call it the kingdom of heaven, others call it the soul, still others name it Nirvana, and we Hindus call it Liberation; you may give it what name you wish. When this happens, a man has not really lost himself; rather, he has found himself.”

As the last word falls from the interpreter’s lips there flashes across my mind those memorable words which were uttered by a wandering Teacher in Galilee, words which have puzzled so many good persons: Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it: and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.

How strangely similar are the two sentences! Yet the Indian Sage has arrived at the thought in his own non-Christian way, through a psychological path which seems exceedingly difficult and appears unfamiliar.

The Maharshi speaks again, his words breaking into my thoughts:

“Unless and until a man embarks upon this quest of the true Self, doubt and uncertainty will follow his footsteps throughout life. The greatest kings and statesmen try to rule others, when in their heart of hearts they know that they cannot rule themselves. Yet the greatest power is at the command of the man who has penetrated to his inmost depth. There are men of giant intellects who spend their lives gathering knowledge about many things. Ask these men if they have solved the mystery of man, if they have conquered themselves, and they will hang their heads in shame. What is the use of knowing about everything else when you do not yet know who you are? Men avoid this enquiry into the true Self, but what else is there so worthy to be undertaken?”

“That is such a difficult, superhuman task,” I comment. The Sage gives an almost imperceptible shrug of his shoulders.

“The question of its possibility is a matter of one’s own experience. The difficulty is less real than you think.”

“For us, who are active, practical Westerners, such introspections . . . . . ?” I begin doubtfully and leave my sentence trailing in midair.

The Maharshi bends down to light a fresh joss stick, which will replace one whose red spark is dying out.

“The realization of truth is the same for both Indians and Europeans. Admittedly the way to it may be harder for those who are engrossed in worldly life, but even then one can and must conquer. The current induced during meditation can be kept up by habit, by practising to do so. Then one can perform his work and activities in that very current itself; there will be no break. Thus, too there will be no difference between meditation and external activities. If you meditate on this question, ‘Who am I?’, if you begin to perceive that neither the body nor the brain nor the desires are really you, then the very attitude of enquiry will eventually draw the answer to you out of the depths of your own being; it will come to you of its own accord as a deep realization.”

Again I ponder his words.

“Know the real Self,” he continues, “and then the truth will shine forth within your heart like sunshine. The mind will become untroubled and real happiness will flood it; for happiness and the true self are identical. You will have no more doubts once you attain this Self-awareness.”

He turns his head and fixes his gaze at the far end of the hall. I know then that he has reached his conversational limit. Thus ends our last talk and I congratulate myself that I have drawn him out of the shell of taciturnity before my departure.


From time to time the Maharshi unexpectedly visits me at the hut after finishing his own lunch. I seize the opportunity to plague him with further questions, which he patiently answers in terse epigrammatic phrases, clipped so short as rarely to constitute complete sentences. But once, when I propound some fresh problem, he makes no answer. Instead, he gazes out towards the jungle covered hills which stretch to the horizon and remains motionless. Many minutes pass but still his eyes are fixed, his presence remote. I am quite unable to discern whether his attention is being given to some invisible psychic being in the distance or whether it is being turned on some inward preoccupation. At first I wonder whether he has heard me, but in the tense silence which ensues, and which I feel unable or unwilling to break, a force greater than my rationalistic mind commences to awe me until it ends by overwhelming me.

The realization forces itself through my wonderment that all my questions are moves in an endless game, the play of thoughts which possess no limit to their extent; that somewhere within me there is a well of certitude which can provide me all the waters of truth I require; and that it will be better to cease my questioning and attempt to realize the tremendous potencies of my own spiritual nature. So I remain silent and wait.

For almost half an hour the Maharshi’s eyes continue to stare straight in front of him in a fixed, unmoving gaze. He appears to have forgotten me, but I am perfectly aware that the sublime realization which has suddenly fallen upon me is nothing else than a spreading ripple of telepathic radiation from this mysterious and imperturbable man.

On another visit he finds me in a pessimistic mood. He tells me of the glorious goal which waits for the man who takes to the way he has shown.

“But, Maharshi, this path is full of difficulties and I am so conscious of my own weakness,” I plead.

“That is the surest way to handicap oneself,” he answers unmoved, “this burdening of one’s mind with the fear of failure and the thought of one’s failings.”

“Yet if it is true — ?” I persist.

“It is not true. The greatest error of a man is to think that he is weak by nature, evil by nature. Every man is divine and strong in his real nature. What are weak and evil are his habits, his desires and thoughts, but not himself.”

His words come as an invigorating tonic. They refresh and inspire me. From another man’s lips, from some lesser and feebler soul, I would refuse to accept them at such worth and would persist in refuting them. But an inward monitor assures me that the Sage speaks out of the depth of a great and authentic spiritual experience, and not as some theorising philosopher mounted on the thin stilts of speculation.

Another time, when we are discussing the West, I make the retort:

“It is easy for you to attain and keep spiritual serenity in this jungle retreat, where there is nothing to disturb or distract you.”

“When the goal is reached, when you know the Knower, there is no difference between living in a house in London and living in the solitude of a jungle,” comes the calm rejoinder.


Day after day brings its fresh indications of the greatness of this man. Among the strangely diversified company of human beings who pass through the hermitage, a pariah stumbles into the hall in some great agony of soul or circumstances and pours out his tribulation at the Maharshi’s feet. The Sage does not reply, for his silence and reserve are habitual; one can easily count up the number of words he uses in a single day. Instead, he gazes quietly at the suffering man, whose cries gradually diminish until he leaves the hall two hours later a more serene and stronger man.

I am learning to see that this is the Maharshi’s way of helping others, this unobtrusive, silent and steady outpouring of healing vibrations into troubled souls, this mysterious telepathic process for which science will one day be required to account.

A cultured brahmin, college-bred, arrives with his questions. One can never be certain whether the Sage will make a verbal response or not, for often he is eloquent enough without opening his lips. But today he is in a communicative mood and a few of his terse phrases, packed with profound meanings as they usually are, open many vistas of thought for the visitor.

A large group of visitors and devotees are in the hall when someone arrives with the news that a certain man, whose criminal reputation is a byword in the little township, is dead. Immediately there is some discussion about him and, as is the wont of human nature, various people engaged in recalling some of his crimes and the more dastardly phases of his character. When the hubbub has subsided and the discussion appears to have ended, the Maharshi opens his mouth for the first time and quietly observes:

“Yes, but he kept himself very clean, for he bathed two or three times a day!”

A peasant and his family have travelled over some hundred miles to pay silent homage to the Sage. He is totally illiterate, knows little beyond his daily work, his religious rites and ancestral superstitions. He has heard from someone that there is a god in human form living at the foot of the Hill of the Holy Beacon. He sits on the floor quietly after having prostrated himself three times. He firmly believes that some blessing of spirit or fortune will come to him as a result of this journey. His wife moves gracefully to his side and drops to the floor. She is clothed in a purple robe which flows smoothly from head to ankles and is then tucked into her waist. Her sleek and smooth hair is glossy with scented oil. Her daughter accompanies her. She is a pretty girl whose ankle-rings click in consort as she steps into the hall. And she follows the charming custom of wearing a white flower behind her ear.

The little family stay for a few hours, hardly speaking, and gaze in reverence at the Maharshi. It is clear that his mere presence provides them with spiritual assurance, emotional felicity and, most paradoxical of all, renewed faith in their creed. For the Sage treats all creeds alike, regards them all as significant and sincere expressions of a great experience, and honours Jesus no less than Krishna.


My meditations take the line he had indicated during my first visit, when he had tantalised me by the vagueness which seemed to surround many of his answers. I have begun to look into my own self.

Who am I?

Am I this body of flesh, blood and bone?

Am I the mind, the thoughts and the feelings which distinguish me from every other person?

One has hitherto naturally and unquestioningly accepted the affirmative answers to these questions but the Maharshi has warned me not to take them for granted. Yet he has refused to formulate any systematic teaching. The gist of his message is:

“Pursue the enquiry ‘Who am I?’ relentlessly. Analyse your entire personality. Try to find out where the I-thought begins. Go on with your meditations. Keep turning your attention within. One day the wheel of thought will slow down and an intuition will mysteriously arise. Follow that intuition, let your thinking stop, and it will eventually lead you to the goal.”

I struggle daily with my thoughts and cut my way slowly into the inner recesses of mind. In the helpful proximity of the Maharshi, my meditations and self soliloquies become increasingly less tiring and more effective. A strong expectancy and sense of being guided inspire my constantly repeated efforts. There are strange hours when I am clearly conscious of the unseen power of the Sage being powerfully impacted on my mentality, with the result that I penetrate a little deeper still into the shrouded borderland of being which surrounds the human mind.


And when the attendant lowers the wicks of the hall’s lamps, following the customary nightly practice I am struck once again by the strange lustre in the Maharshi’s calm eyes. They glow like twin stars through the half darkness. I remind myself that never have I met in any man eyes as remarkable as those of this last descendant of India’s rishis. In so far as the human eyes can mirror divine power, it is a fact that the Sage’s do that.

The heavily scented incense smoke rises in soft spirals the while I watch those eyes that never flicker. During the forty minutes which pass so strangely, I say nothing to him and he says nothing to me. What use are words? We now understand each other better without them, for in this profound silence our minds approach a beautiful harmony, and in this optic telegraphy I receive a clear unuttered message. Now that I have caught a wonderful and memorable glimpse of the Maharshi’s viewpoint on life, my own inner life has begun to mingle with his.

I fight the oncoming fever during the two days which follow and manage to keep it at bay.

The old man approaches my hut in the afternoon.

“Your stay among us draws to an end, my brother,” he says regretfully. “But you will surely return to us one day?”

“Most surely!” I echo confidently.

When he leaves me I stand at the door and look up at the Hill of the Holy Beacon — Arunachala, the Sacred Red Mountain, as the people of the countryside prefer to call it. It has become the colourful background of all my existence; always I have but to raise my eyes from whatever I am doing, whether eating, walking, talking or meditating, and there is its strange, flat headed shape confronting me in the open or through a window. It is somehow inescapable in this place, but the strange spell it throws over me is more inescapable still. I begin to wonder whether this queer, solitary peak has enchanted me. There is a local tradition that it is entirely hollow and that in its interior dwell several great spiritual beings who are invisible to mortal gaze, but I disdain the story as a childish legend. And yet this lonely hill holds me in a powerful thrall, despite the fact that I have seen others, infinitely more attractive. This rugged piece of Nature, with
its red laterite boulders tumbled about in disorderly masses and glowing like dull fire in the sunlight, possesses a strong personality which emanates a palpable awe creating influence.

With the fall of dusk I take my farewells of everyone except the Maharshi. I feel quietly content because my battle for spiritual certitude has been won, and because I have won it without sacrificing my dearly held rationalism for a blind credulity. Yet when the Maharshi comes to the courtyard with me a little later, my contentment suddenly deserts me. This man has strangely conquered me and it deeply affects my feelings to leave him. He has grappled me to his own soul with unseen hooks which are harder than steel, although he has sought only to restore a man to himself, to set him free and not to enslave him. He has taken me into the benign presence of my spiritual Self and helped me, dull Westerner that I am, to translate a meaningless term into a living and blissful experience.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Back to Yoga

The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) has launched a “Take back Yoga” campaign with the aim of educating people on the historical fact that Yoga originated from Hinduism. While a significant number of the world’s population practice Yoga, they seldom associate it with the religion.

A series of articles have appeared in key newspapers and magazines debating the issue. The HAF side proclaiming that Yoga has deep Hindu roots was argued by Aseem Shukla, to which Deepak Chopra responded by dismissing the case with his article “Sorry, your patent on yoga has run out”. The debate has spilled over to Christians questioning if they should practice Yoga if it is an alien religion that interferes with their faith.

I agree with HAF that Yoga, specifically Hatha Yoga (postures etc.), does have Hindu roots. However, the debate in general has ignored some fundamental facts about “Yoga”, as both the proponents and opponents of the “Take back Yoga” campaign have seemed to not quite fully grasp the true meaning of the term “Yoga” in the original source texts. I will attempt to explain what Yoga originally meant in Hinduism, and how the popular modern practice of Yoga, known as Hatha Yoga, fits into the religion.

The earliest references to the term “Yoga” appear in the Upanishads, which are the antecedent portions of the scriptures known as the “Vedas” among Hindus. An example is the Katha Upanishad:

Steady restraint over the senses they regard as yoga.”[Katha Upanishad 2.3.11]

Since the Katha Upanishad is one of the principal scriptures of what is now known as “Hinduism”, certainly the most ancient references to the term “Yoga” appear in the Hindu religion.

Yoga as a religious-philosophical school began with the Yoga Sutras, a set of brief aphorisms on the topic of Yoga written by the sage Patanjali. The Yoga Sutras contain the first systematic arrangement and study of the fundamental principles of Yoga. It would not be incorrect to say that all later development of “Yoga” owes much to the Yoga Sutras, as the codification of Yoga is traced to this text.

I will now utilize an important but relatively obscure book that can shed much light into the recent discussions on Yoga: the Jivan-mukti-viveka (“Wisdom of Living Liberation”, abbreviated as JMV). This book is often attributed to a medieval monk known as Vidyaranya (sometimes not agreed to be the author by some modern scholars). No matter who the author was, the JMV is revered as a great book in the Hindu tradition. For instance, H.H. Chandrashekhara Bharati, a past pontiff of the esteemed Sringeri monastery in South India, has quoted the JMV as an authority in his writings, revealing his high regard for the text.

There is a doctoral dissertation on the JMV by Robert Alan Gooding of the University of Texas at Austin, which can be downloaded from a link on his homepage. There is also a translation of the JMV by Swami Moksadananda. I will use both these texts, but with my own personal translation, to discuss Yoga in Hinduism.

(I must caution that the JMV is a very serious text and may not be intelligible to the casual reader.)

The JMV quotes many verses from the Yoga Sutras, including the verse at the very beginning that defines Yoga:

Yoga Sutra Verse 1: Henceforth begins instruction in Yoga.
Yoga Sutra Verse 2: Yoga is restraint of mental modifications.

The second statement provides a concise but precise definition of Yoga as the way to restrain mental modifications. The JMV then explains with examples the methods or means of restraining mental modifications.

The JMV shows the way to rid one’s mind of anger:

“To remove the anger that one feels towards another:
If you are angry with him who harms you, then why not be angry with anger itself which hinders the attainment of all the four objects of life (Purusharthas) Virtue, Wealth, Pleasure and Salvation?
Even if the anger is successful in punishing the offender, it destroys the virtue, fame and wealth of the angry one. If the anger is vain, it torments the body of the one who is afflicted by anger.
How can anger, which is beneficial neither in this life nor the next, take shelter in the minds of the wise?”

The method of removing hatred according to the JMV:

“…hatred burns the heart all the time. When one … feels compassion for all miserable creatures then the hatred towards the enemy etc. dissolves and the mind becomes pure. Great men show the manner it is done by saying the prayer: 'Let all be happy and free from diseases; and achieve good of their lives, and may none suffer pain.'”

The means to eliminate pride:

“…one who has pride must think, “One day, my pride will be humbled [and cause me distress]”. [We have seen that] the pride of many scholars has been humbled in debates…”

One may try to act in the world in such a manner as to avoid all criticism, which although is not a bad quality, is not in the realm of possibility, and is therefore to be removed as per the JMV:

“'I will behave in such a way so that no one criticizes me, and everyone will praise me' constitutes the worldly tendency. This is impure, since it is impossible to accomplish. Even Rama and his wife Sita – the mother of the world and paragon of feminine virtue – were scandalized; what to say of others? People freely speak ill of each other referring to their local peculiarities…With this in view it is said: ‘None can satisfy the people, they always speak ill of others…a forgiving person is deemed as feeble, a strong man is thought of as a bully, absorbed in contemplation one is looked upon as a thief and a handsome man is deemed lustful. There is no way to please everybody, so one should look after one's own good. What can loquacious people do?’”

These are among the several techniques advocated in the JMV for the removal of bad qualities in one’s mind, replacing the non-virtuous thoughts (e.g. anger, hatred, pride, seeking to avoid criticism) with virtuous ones (e.g. calm temper, compassion, humility, seeking one’s own good). There are other suggestions given by the JMV for eliminating jealousy, remorse, etc.

The JMV considers a cogent objection to such a practice of the removal of bad qualities:

Objection: The bad qualities in one’s mind are infinite. Hence all practice of [removing them from one’s mind] is futile.
Reply: Not so. A person’s mind cannot have infinite bad qualities, just as a person’s body cannot have all possible diseases…Therefore each person should examine his or her own mind and remove those bad qualities that one finds there.”

It may appear to some that the practice of removing bad qualities in one’s own mind is not sufficient to calm the mind, so perhaps one must resort to harsher means such as Asanas (Hatha Yogic postures), Pranayama (Breath Control), etc. But the JMV steers the student clear of that way:

"There are two ways to bring home an animal that has strayed away. The first way is to pet the animal and offer it green grass (to eat – it is here assumed that the said animal is an herbivore), and the second way is to shout at the animal and beat it. Similarly, there are two ways to still the mind – the first is by gently convincing the mind to view friend and foe with equanimity, and the second is to make manly effort in breathing and mental function. The first way of Soft-Yoga (Mridu Yoga) quickly leads the mind to tranquility; the second way of Hard-Yoga (Hatha Yoga) accomplishes the result very slowly.”

Here at last we have a contrast between the “Soft-Yoga” that stresses on friendliness, compassion, etc. as methods to restrain the mind and the “Hard-Yoga” that is practiced by means of breath-control and firm concentration. The first method of Soft-Yoga or Mridu Yoga is the primary intent of the most ancient Hindu scriptures, while the second way has become the more widespread modern meaning of Yoga, which is “Hard-Yoga” or Hatha Yoga.

The method of Soft-Yoga occurs frequently in the Yoga Sutras of sage Patanjali:

Yoga Sutra Verse 33: By cultivating friendliness towards (pleasant) happiness, compassion towards misery, gladness towards virtue and indifference towards vice, the mind becomes pure.

The above methods in the Yoga Sutras involve leading one’s mind gently along the way of good thoughts, which is completely supported by the JMV, as it quotes this verse from the Yoga Sutras.

The JMV considers Soft-Yoga as markedly superior to Hard-Yoga:

"Using Hard-Yoga (Hatha Yoga) to control the mind when Soft-Yoga (Mridu Yoga) suffices, is like using a magic ointment to see in the dark when the lamp suffices."

The JMV admits that the goal can be reached via Hard-Yoga, but only that it is not the natural way. Soft-Yoga remains the more preferred and commendable way.

The JMV finally explains how the practice of Yoga leads to salvation:

“Those knowledgeable about the tradition (sampradaya-vit) narrate a story thus: ‘The eggs of some bird which were laid on the shore were carried away by the ocean by the flowing tide. Determined to retrieve the eggs by drying up the ocean, it started throwing out water drop by drop by its beak. Although discouraged by its friends and many other birds it did not desist, rather requested them to assist. The compassionate sage Narada, seeing them suffer in various ways, flying in and out of the ocean, was moved and sent the divine bird Garuda there. Then the frightened ocean, which started to dry up by the wind produced by the fluttering of the wings of the divine bird Garuda, returned those eggs to the bird.’
 In the same way, the Yogi obtains the Grace (anugraha) of the Supreme Lord (Ishvara) for being engaged in the Highest Virtue (parama-dharma) of untiringly restraining the mind.”

The sequence of events is:

Practice of Yoga à Grace of the Supreme Lord à Salvation

This is also helpful in clarifying that effort is crucial in obtaining the Grace of the Lord. While any effort by itself without the Lord’s Grace does not result in salvation, the Lord’s Grace is gained only by effort in Yoga. Simply put:

Zero Effort, Zero Grace.
Miniscule Effort (in Soft-Yoga), Infinite Grace.

Of course, the JMV fully recognizes that the practice of Yoga is by no means unique to any specific religion:

“Adherents of all religions, excepting the materialists, who believe in salvation are unable to disagree with the practice of Yoga. The scriptures of the Jains, Buddhists (Followers of Buddha), Vaisheshikas (Atomist school), Naiyayikas (Logical school), Shaivas (Worshippers of Shiva), Vaishnavas (Worshippers of Vishnu), Shaktas (Worshippers of Shakti or female deity), Samkhya (Enumeration school), Yoga and the like, differ in their description of salvation but agree that the way to it is Yoga. Therefore, the Master of Yoga is undisputedly honored by all.

It is commonly held that Hinduism is pluralistic and “accepts all religions”, but this only confuses the listener who wonders how the doctrines of Christianity or Buddhism or Islam can possibly be reconciled with Hinduism, as differences and contradictions abound between the various religious doctrines. In fact, Hinduism does not accept the doctrinal conclusions of other religions, however Hinduism does claim that the practice of the various religions will eventually lead to salvation so long as such practice helps remove bad qualities within one’s own mind. Since the practice of removing bad qualities in the mind is nothing but (Soft-)Yoga, the unifying factor in all religions, according to Hinduism, is the practice of Yoga.

There is hardly any dispute that the chief of Hindu scriptures, the Gita, teaches Yoga, as the dialog in the sixth chapter of the Gita indicates:

Arjuna said, “Krishna, I consider it impossible to restrain the mind which is restless and turbulent like the wind.”
Krishna replied reassuringly, “Restraint of the mind is indeed difficult, but it is possible by the regular practice of Yoga…Therefore, Arjuna, be a Yogi (तस्माद्योगी भवार्जुन).”

The definition of Yoga in the second chapter of the Gita is akin to the Soft-Yoga of the JMV: “Even-mindedness is said to be Yoga” (समत्वं योग उच्यते).

The gist of the Gita is about one ordinary man’s (Arjuna’s) struggle with perturbance of the mind, being compassionately shown the way of Yoga (being even-minded in success and failure) to obtain the Grace of the Lord (Krishna), and thereby Salvation.

References

Take Yoga Back
Bringing to Light Yoga's Hindu Roots

The theft of yoga
By Aseem Shukla
April 18, 2010

Sorry, your patent on yoga has run out
By Deepak Chopra
April 25, 2010

Hindu Group Stirs a Debate Over Yoga’s Soul
By PAUL VITELLO
November 27, 2010

'Take Back Yoga' campaign: Back where?
By Cathy Lynn Grossman
Nov 28, 2010

Yoga poses dangers to genuine Christian faith: Theologian
September 20, 2010

The Subtle Body — Should Christians Practice Yoga?
September 20, 2010

The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali